Thando Longwe-Smit vs Anton Chekhov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jul at 09:51 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Longwe-Smit vs A. Chekhov

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Longwe-Smit 1 - 0 Chekhov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Thando Longwe-Smit winning 2 and Anton Chekhov winning 0. The last match between Thando Longwe-Smit and Anton Chekhov was at the M15 Hillcrest, 10-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Thando Longwe-Smit getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Longwe-Smit | 1 |
| Chekhov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Hillcrest(07-10-25)
T. Longwe-Smit vs A. Chekhov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.23% (33-29) | Career Total W/L | 44.86% (96-118) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Longwe-Smit vs A. Chekhov Match Preview:
- Second Serve Success: Recently, Longwe-Smit has secured 44.26% points on their second serve, while Chekhov has managed 39.37%. Could this serve advantage impact the match?
- Return Toughness: Chekhov excels in return games, securing 52.23% of opponent's second serve points against Longwe-Smit's 44.5%. On first serve returns, Longwe-Smit achieves 26.65% and Chekhov 22.64%.
- Pressure Handling: When facing breakpoints, Chekhov has a slight edge, saving 53.25% compared to Longwe-Smit's 52.38%.
- Match Winning Consistency: Over the past year, Chekhov has a superior match win rate of 68.75%, compared to Longwe-Smit's 51.85%.
- Surface Preferences: Both players perform comparably on hard surfaces, with Longwe-Smit winning 51% and Chekhov 50% of matches. Does this neutrality favor any specific player?
- Level of Competition: Both primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, but Chekhov has faced stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 163.25, contrasting with Longwe-Smit's 229.81.
- Deciding Set Clutch: Longwe-Smit excels in deciding sets, winning 67% compared to Chekhov's 33% over the past year. Could this become relevant in a closely contested match?
- Breakpoint Opportunities: Chekhov is better at exploiting breakpoints, converting 34.15% against Longwe-Smit's 24.24%. How might this affect their tactics?
Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing comparison of skills and strategies. Longwe-Smit seems to have a slight edge with their second serve, potentially boosting their service games.
Chekhov, however, is formidable in return games, particularly against second serves. This strength could pose a significant challenge to Longwe-Smit.
Match pressure will also be a factor, with Chekhov showing slightly better breakpoint saving stats, although both players are relatively close in this area.
Chekhov's higher win rate and experience facing tougher competition may give them a hidden advantage coming into this contest.
Overall, factoring in Chekhov's superior performance in returns and opponent quality, they are projected to have a higher chance of emerging victorious in this upcoming match.
Thando Longwe-Smit vs Anton Chekhov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Longwe-Smit vs A. Chekhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:31:17 | Average Match Time | 1:31:17 |
| 60% (27/45) | 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (24/37) |
| 67% (12/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (5/20) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (28/57) | Return Points Win % | 27% (12/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Longwe-Smit Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | ||
A. Chekhov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

T. Longwe-Smit vs A. Chekhov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.23% (33/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.86% (96/118) |
| 51.80% (72/67) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.46% (223/257) |
| 51.22% (674/642) | Games Win/Loss | 48.57% (2102/2226) |
| 53.23% (33/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.46% (46/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.84% (41/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 124 | Aces Total | 250 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 127 | Total Double Faults | 412 |
| 1:10:47 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 260.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.98 |
| 57% (1462/2559) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3705/6108) |
| 70% (1017/1462) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2320/3705) |
| 50% (544/1097) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1073/2403) |
| 37% (91/247) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (264/628) |
| 38% (993/2626) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2595/6429) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/16) |
| 53.23% (33/29) | Futures W/L | 48.48% (96/102) |
| 53% (33/62) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (95/213) |
| 62% (8/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (14/34) |
| 60% (9/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 89% (35/31) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (101/81) |
| 11% (35/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (101/20) |
| 7% (27/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (113/15) |